Search Site
305 Broadway, Ste 100, NY, NY 10007
2555 Grand Concourse, Bronx, NY 10468
15 Brant Avenue, Unit 8 Clark, New Jersey 07066
Call for a consultation 212-267-2555

Stay of Removal and Deferred Action

Previously, I have offered some further information on How to Stop Deportation and Removal as well as Risk Factors for Deportation. Today we continue the conversation on stays of removal and deferred action.

If a person has been ordered deported or removed from the United States, it may be possible to get the execution of the removal order postponed. For example, a court may order a temporary stay of removal when an appeal, a motion to reopen, or a motion to reconsider is pending before it. In the executive branch, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants requests, at its discretion, for an administrative stay of removal or deferred action. Such DHS decisions are based on:

  • Sympathetic family, social, health and economic factors
  • Its civil enforcement priorities

The civil enforcement priorities were promulgated in 2011 in policy memoranda by Director John Morton of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).  The priorities became necessary because ICE lacks the resources to remove more than 400,000 non-citizens per year, which is less than 4 percent of those estimated to be illegally present in the United States.  These priorities are designed to optimally promote “our national security, public safety, and the integrity of our border and immigration controls.”

  1. The number one priority is those “who pose a danger to national security or a risk to the public safety,” which includes terrorists and violent criminals
  2. The second highest priority concerns recent illegal entrants who have violated immigration controls at the border or cunningly “gamed” the visa and visa waiver programs
  3. The third highest priority is assigned to non-citizens who are fugitives; those have reentered the country illegally after removal; and those who obtain admission or status by visa, identification, or immigration fraud.

Being classified in one of the three top categories does not absolutely foreclose the possibility of an administrative stay of removal or deferred action.  Moreover, not all non-citizens with low-priority cases will automatically receive prosecutorial discretion.  As a practical matter, the chances of getting an administrative stay of removal or deferred action will vary from case to case depending on some combination of sympathetic factors, enforcement priority classification, and the subjective inclinations of the DHS decision-maker.

Although administrative stays of removal and deferred action requests involve similar supporting documents and evaluative factors, there are significant differences.  A request for an administrative stay of removal requires the filing of an official form (I-246) and a filing fee of $155, whereas a deferred action request simply requires a letter.  An administrative stay of removal usually has a duration lasting up to a year, while deferred action can be granted for up to two years.  Finally, an administrative stay of removal is normally filed as a last ditch effort to forestall the execution of a removal order after a deportation officer and field office director have ruled out the possibility of deferred action.

This blog series is intended to give a basic introduction on how to stop removal and deportation.  In light of the technicalities and complexities of this subject, noncitizens facing deportation and removal proceedings should seek and retain expert legal advice and representation throughout the proceedings.

To learn more about removal and deportation, contact Bretz & Coven, LLP.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Immigration Consequences of Criminal and Fraudulent Conduct
The immigration consequences of criminal or fraudulent conduct can be harsh and often illogical. Even a very minor offense could have a dramatic immigration consequence, including deportation, detention without bond, being denied naturalization, a visa or re-entry into the United States. Likewise, the use of fake or fraudulent documents, aliases, and other misrepresentations can have similar immigration consequences. Kerry Bretz and Bretz & Coven have been counseling non-citizen criminal defendants, as well as their lawyers, for over 20 years. We have a long history of strategizing deportation and removal defenses, as well as applications for waivers, in very complicated cases.

Our Partners
Our Associates
Client Reviews
"Was trying to get Green Card since about 7 years. Finally when I switched to this law firm I was able to get green card very fast with great confidence. Big thanks to Eileen, Kerry, Manjit and Olga." - Dinesh, Kansas

""With an extensive criminal history: over 14 arrests, 2 State prison bids and several felony convictions no lawyer wanted my case in 2010. Thanks to the experts at Bretz & Coven who worked diligently and with precision, today I am a United States citizen." - E.A. Brooklyn, NY

"Absolutely one the best, if not the best immigration attorneys. They helped from start to finish in my green card process. At no point was I blind-sided by anything. Simply amazing!" - Leon B. Jersey City,

Awards & Affiliations
  • badge bbb #1
    logo best in New York
    2020 member
  • best in  2020
    Super Lawyer #1
    Best law firm
    Top 10 Attorney Kerry Bretz
  • Super lawyers Kerry Bretz
    Ethic 2020
  • Facebook Pages
    • Main
    Contact us

    Quick Contact Form